Oakland has fewer police than we had in 2002. Oakland has well under half the staffing maintained by most major cities.
Crime in Oakland is worse today than it was in 2002, and after four years of mayor Quan, crime in 2014 was worse than it was in 2010, the year before she became mayor.
Staffing is so low that the department is unable to respond to entire categories of theft and other crimes, unable to investigate more than a handful of reported crimes, and completely unable to respond to neighborhood crimes when officers are required to work on a riot situation.
Incoming mayor Libby Schaaf soon announced that she will not give police staffing a sustained boost "anytime soon." (Tribune, Jan. 10, 2015) Her budget proposal for FY 2015-17 aims to reach 762 officers after two years – less than two dozen more than we had in 2002. The mayor's stance will keep Oakland among the ten cities in the country for robberies, burglaries, and assaults.
In addition to severe understaffing of sworn officers, the police department has two dozen budgeted but unfilled civilian positions, including thirteen dispatchers who take your 911 calls.
Oakland cannot be a safe city with so few police. The problem has been the persistent refusal of the Oakland mayor and city council to make public safety a priority. That must change.
Do most other cities waste money on a police force twice the size they need? We don't think so. Oakland has half the officers it needs to maintain public safety. That's why the city ranks as the fourth most dangerous city in the country. That's why a culture of disruption and disrespect dominates our neighborhoods.
Oakland's ostrich crowd (the leaders who ignore our crisis in public safety while prattling forever about social programs) cannot say that poverty is the root cause of our problem. Oakland has a poverty rate typical of large cities, including many that are much safer than Oakland.